HomeEmailContact UsEast Africa Business
Tanzania News - The Citizen
Home
Government on Why Serengeti road is a must project  Send to a friend
Saturday, 03 July 2010 06:31

By Mkinga Mkinga and Lucas Liganga
The government has said plans to construct a road through the Serengeti National Park (Senapa) are still on course despite emerging opposition from environmental lobbyists and conservationists.Minister for Natural Resources and Tourism Shamsa Mwangunga pointed out that the government is obliged to fulfil a campaign promise, made by President Jakaya Kikwete in 2005, that the fourth phase administration under CCM would complete construction of the $480 (Sh372 billion) Arusha-Musoma road.

The 480km road hit a snag in the past, following concern over a requirement that a section of it would pass through the park, famous for its spectacular annual migration of millions of wildlife into Kenya’s Maasai Mara game reserve.

The wildlife migration attracts hundreds of tourists every year, earning Tanzania and Kenya millions of shillings in foreign exchange.    

Campaigners are warning that the opening up of Senapa to commercial traffic would be disastrous because the proposed 53km of road through the world-acclaimed wilderness would jeopardise the animal trek and dent the park’s ranking as one of the world’s leading tourist attraction.  

Some of the lobbyists, including Wildlife Conservation Society of Tanzania, are now planning to hold meetings and raise petitions to persuade the government to go for an alternative route around the park and leave Serengeti untouched.

“The Wildlife Conservation Society of Tanzania (WCST) is soliciting support from Environmental NGOs to form a coalition which will conduct a campaign to avert the construction of a commercial highway through this critical part of the Serengeti,” said the society in an email communication.

 “Every able person should join in condemning this destructive proposal which undermines hard gains and conservation achievements of sustaining this natural and cultural gift to humanity. There is no alternate to the Serengeti but there are many alternative areas for building an effective road system. We therefore call for common sense to prevail so as not to allow the construction of the road through the narrow northern part of the Serengeti National Park!! The road should be routed through the alternate southern end of the Park,” the statement added.

But in a quick government reaction to campaigns among local and international groups that got underway over two weeks ago to oppose the project, Ms Mwangunga dismissed growing fears that the road would interfere with the Serengeti eco-system.

In an interview with The Citizen this week, the minister said the main reason the road connecting Arusha-Musoma was considered was because of the need to satisfy public interests. She said the construction of the road wouldn’t disturb the popular annual wildlife migration as claimed by the campaigners.

Seeking to allay fears, she said the road, which would link Serengeti- Loliondo districts with the national grid of major roads, won’t cut cross Senapa but would be routed in a manner that won’t affect wildlife migration patterns.

Work on the project, according to Mr Deusdedit Kakoko, who is the regional manager for Tanzania Roads Agency (Tanroads), will begin early 2012. A feasibility study is currently underway, he said. Users currently loop more than 418km to the south to skirt the protected Serengeti.

“Those criticising the road construction know nothing about what we’ve planned...We’re all keen to preserve our natural resources…We’ll never compromise on that,” declared Ms Mwangunga.

She said an Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) showed that the project was feasible before it was included in the government’s 10 years Transport Sector Improvement Program (TSIP).

According to the minister, only an unpaved 40-mile stretch of the two-lane tarmac road would pass through the national park. This, she insisted, won’t carry any threat to the annual movement of tens of thousands of wildebeest, between the Mara and Serengeti watering grounds, as suggested by the activists.

The critics, however, point out that the idea to build the road was first mooted 20 years ago and was later shelved over concerns it would cause environmental degradation, after the World Bank turned down a funding request on the basis of recommendations by an EIA.  

They point out that increasing traffic “might become the highest risk to the wildebeest migration and the integrity of the Serengeti as the number one natural wonder of the world upon which Tanzania’s tourism depends.”

The new standoff is threatening to thrust the country into yet another potentially damaging international environmental conservation storm. It is a stark reminder of the recent controversy generated by the failed attempt to sell 90 tonnes of its ivory stockpiles worth about $15 million (Sh19.5 billion).

The Convention on International Trade in Endangered Species (Cites) conference in Qatar, in March, threw out a Tanzania’s request to sell the ivory following a fierce campaign by other member countries.

They argued that allowing a one-off sale could bring back poaching of the African elephant.  Zambia also lost a similar appeal during the same meeting.

The government has since indicated its intention to file a fresh appeal so that it may be allowed to sell the stockpile, even though this might have to probably wait for at least seven more years.

Add this page to your favorite Social Bookmarking websites
Reddit! Del.icio.us! Mixx! Free and Open Source Software News Google! Live! Facebook! StumbleUpon! TwitThis Joomla Free PHP
Last Updated on Monday, 05 July 2010 07:51
 

Comments  

 
0 #14 Greg 2011-11-10 15:17
RIDICULOUS FACT COVERAGE:
"The wildlife migration attracts hundreds of tourists every year, earning Tanzania and Kenya millions of shillings in foreign exchange."

In fact, the park attracts tens of thousands visitors and stand for millions of DOLLARS in foreign exchange for Tanzania alone, not to mention Kenya.

"She said the construction of the road wouldn’t disturb the popular annual wildlife migration as claimed by the campaigners."

How did she even get elected to preserve our nations natural resources? Probably the same corruption way as others in power!

ME, as a TANZANIAN, do not want our nature destroyed by our corruptive government!
Quote
 
 
0 #13 John Schauber 2011-01-20 07:22
The Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) and the government’s 10 years Transport Sector Improvement Program (TSIP) should be made public showing who is doing the study and who are the authors of the Program and who is financing all aspects of both. And it is hard to believe that what is reported to be a minimum 6 lane high speed commercial Highway will be funneled down to a two lane unpaved road for the "40" mile stretch through the Serengeti. Something does not ring true. Follow the money there is more here than meets the eye. I love Tanzania and it hurts my heart to see politicians chipping away at its future for short term goals. We know that phosphate mining operations are finite resources in the area and once they are depleted and any other resources removed the damage will have been done and the people will be worse off as will the wildlife. The people of Tanzania must speak up and protect their heritage from another wave of users. Peace and good things to all. Peace to all.
Quote
 
 
+1 #12 Lincoln Park 2010-12-31 07:46
What a sad day it will be for our planet. I find it very hard to type what I really want to say......but it is very clear that the corruption and greed that is happening in Africa is and shall always be.....why should the Serengeti matter to them? Look at the Amazon (the lungs of the earth) still being destroyed and still nothing is being done. I assure you one thing, the only ones to benefit from this are the corrupt, and so uneducated, greedy, power hungry politicians and coporations. This new highway is not for the Tanzanian people but for the above mentioned......once the mining is comepleted, the damaged is done, there is no going back trying to fix it.......this majestic park will never be the same. :sad:
Quote
 
 
0 #11 joe hughes 2010-12-28 06:09
what is wrong with this president for a person that cares so much about his people and wildlife to put a road through the park when he has other oppsitions, to save a few hours ,when the road south would be more econiomical to his people ,something dont sound right(and the minister of tourism is saying a road smack through a migration area of millions of animals is ok no problem needs brain scan becouse their is a problem
Quote
 
 
+1 #10 Andy 2010-10-06 15:41
Another case of smart-ass leaders not listening to the professionals and those who are passionate about the place, the animals, the beauty. To compromise the Serengeti will be one of the greatest pities in African histories, considering how much development has already happened in the pristine places we should hold so close. Morally, if this is allowed, it is a sign from the leaders that Africa means nothing to them for the future, and that the selfishness that has encompassed so much of African projects and places is as rife as ever. Pity it happens to be in surely one of the most exquisite places I have ever laid eyes on.
Quote
 
 
0 #9 Pat 2010-09-22 07:29
What would Tanzania has left when the damages has been done ? I believe the Tanzanian should stand up against building this hwy.
Quote
 
 
-14 #8 rogers 2010-07-05 00:52
Whatever the Govt does there will be those who are born to oppose, stand firm and build the road, one cannot make an ommelette without breaking a few eggs. As for Nonda who opts to stay outside the country, Good Riddance
Quote
 
 
+6 #7 Uwe Skrzypczak 2010-07-04 14:27
It is now scientifically proven, if this road is built, the migration is to collapse, with far more worse consequences. Here is one of many links www.zgf.de/.../
Quote
 
 
+6 #6 Xavier Surinyach 2010-07-04 12:20
The Minister for Natural Resources and Tourism Shamsa Mwangunga tells "only an unpaved 40-mile stretch of the two-lane tarmac road would pass through the national park". The great migration is not only crossing throught this narrow corridor of 40-mile. The main problem is not if the road is unpaved or tarmac. The problem is lot of trucks and cars driving along a wildlife sanctuary. Paved or unpaved the Government of Tanzania will be cutting the migratory route forever. What is the real reason they don't want to consider the southern route? Maybe we have the answer in the pockets of some people.
Quote
 
 
+1 #5 Nonda 2010-07-04 03:27
Mimi sisomi habari za Tanzania siku hizi bali ni kama ninazikwaa mara moja moja kwani kila ukisoma ni habari mbaya tu na kusikitisha , wizi , ujambazi, ulafi ,uuwaji wa watu wa magonjwa ya ngozi na vikongwe kushutumiwa uchawi ...aagh!!! na uharibifu wa mazingira , well , i am glad i am now out of that country ,though , but,it hurts me so much ...my country...
Quote
 

Add comment


Security code
Refresh

Banner
Banner