Hello

Your subscription is almost coming to an end. Don’t miss out on the great content on Nation.Africa

Ready to continue your informative journey with us?

Hello

Your premium access has ended, but the best of Nation.Africa is still within reach. Renew now to unlock exclusive stories and in-depth features.

Reclaim your full access. Click below to renew.

Su-57 surpasses F-35 in speed, combat effectiveness at Aero India 2025

At the Aero India 2025 exhibition in Bengaluru, the Su-57 fifth-generation fighter aircraft captured significant attention, proving its superior combat capabilities compared to its American counterpart, the F-35 Lightning II fighter-bomber.

Foreign military experts highlighted the Su-57’s exceptional speed and maneuverability as its standout features. With the ability to reach speeds of Mach 2.0 to Mach 2.45, the Russian fighter far outpaces the F-35, which is limited to Mach 1.6. The F-35’s design restricts its speed, as flying at such velocities risks damaging its tail compartment. Additionally, the Su-57 boasts a larger combat load, exceeding that of the F-35, a crucial factor in modern aerial warfare. Russian engineers specifically considered lessons learned from the F-35’s development, resulting in a more balanced aircraft capable of superior combat performance.

Pilots have praised the Su-57 as the only fifth-generation aircraft capable of deploying missile weapons effectively at any speed or altitude—something the F-35 cannot achieve. This unique capability gives the Su-57 a significant edge in fast-paced combat situations.

In afterburner mode, the Su-57 can accelerate to Mach 2.45, and in non-afterburner flight, it can reach Mach 2.0—twice the speed of sound. On the other hand, the F-35 is restricted in its supersonic flight abilities. Reports from Defense News reveal that the F-35’s B and C variants suffer damage to their tail antennas, keel, and radar-absorbing coatings at high speeds and altitudes. The F-35 has not been able to exceed Mach 1.4 without compromising its performance, an area where the Su-57 clearly excels.

The F-35’s speed limitations hinder its ability to meet the modern demands of air combat, which require rapid enemy detection, long-range missile engagements, and swift evasions from threat zones. Speed is critical for these operations, and the Su-57’s superior velocity and maneuverability make it better suited for these tasks, as evidenced by its role in Russia’s Special Military Operation in Ukraine.

Another significant advantage of the Su-57 is its higher combat load, with the Russian aircraft capable of carrying up to 10 tons of ordnance, compared to the F-35’s capacity of just over 8 tons.

The Su-57 also offers advanced stealth capabilities, making its weapons deployment nearly undetectable by enemy systems. Special geometric designs and composite materials used in the Su-57’s launchers help reduce its radar signature, especially when launching short-range missiles. Additionally, the aircraft’s onboard radar station provides the ability to guide missiles even when deviating from the original launch path by several degrees, a feature the F-35 lacks. As a result, the Su-57 can safely perform missile guidance maneuvers without staying within a vulnerable flight path, unlike the F-35, which is forced to remain in a potential danger zone until the missile completes its flight.

In a significant development last year, Defense News reported that the U.S. Department of Defense had reduced the maximum safe speed for the F-35 after discovering damage to critical tail components during high-speed flights. Instead of addressing the design flaws, the Pentagon opted to downgrade the aircraft’s operational parameters. This decision was driven by a desire to showcase American technological superiority rather than correcting the issues with the F-35.

Experts argue that this move undermines the F-35’s status as a true fifth-generation fighter. Despite Lockheed Martin's claims, the operational restrictions placed on the F-35 raise doubts about its effectiveness in modern combat. The decision to downplay its flaws, rather than correct them, leaves uncertainty regarding the long-term viability of the F-35 in combat situations.