Isn’t ‘sharenting’ a ticking time bomb in our digital age?
What you need to know:
- The attention of social media is tempting! The likes, comments, and follows encourage people to share more and more, often to the point where they forget the boundary between what should be public and what should remain private.
It is common today to see pictures and videos on social media featuring parents or caregivers and their children. This content varies widely, ranging from casual conversations and surreptitious recordings to staged skits, pranks, and more.
The term sharenting, a portmanteau formed by blending the sounds and meanings of “sharing” and “parenting,”has emerged to describe this phenomenon. Languages worldwide evolve in this way, with new realities being identified and named. The credit for coining sharenting is attributed to The Wall Street Journal in 2013.
Sharenting is a complex issue, more complex than it appears on the surface level. This is because parents oftentimes share almost real-time sensitive details about their children continuously, exposing them to millions of strangers online. It is considered by experts to be a violation of the right to privacy on the part of the children, of which parents are fully aware. With online content being monetised, it is graver when the financial gain is attached to the online appearance of the children.
While parents have the freedom to enjoy social media, it is important to prioritise the greater good for their children. It is important to establish and observe a sense of boundary for one’s digital self, as this protects even those who are closely related to the person, such as family and friends. The digital self tends to live much longer and go much further ahead of us and is oftentimes open to misinterpretation as it cannot explain itself. Over the internet, people only judge what they see; they don’t ask a video or a picture to explain itself.
The attention of social media is tempting! The likes, comments, and follows tickle people into sharing more and more, to the extent that many forget the threshold of what should really be for public consumption and what should not be.
Think of parents sharing videos of their children eating or breastfeeding, sleeping, dancing, or just playing on their own, or swimming, etc. These would be properly understood in their context when shared amongst close family circles, but not across continents, as they lack relevance, and they are totally appealing to people’s attention to the children.
Everyone loves privacy, even children. No one would consent to being watched by millions of strangers when at his or her lowest moments, when angry, or while being scolded. Yet these are popular among sharenting parents. They share with the world awkward conversations and videos that should not leave the doorsteps of their homes in most cases for attention. This attention is in turn monetised over those platforms.
In the long run, as they say, the internet does not forget. These children will grow up to find themselves scattered all over the internet, and worse still, they will see the many negative comments of the unkind netizens who, while hiding behind their phone screens, dare to sexualise young children and post hateful and spiteful words, even towards children.
There are also child predators online who can get details about those children from the sharenting continuum. Some studies have considered sharenting to be a syndrome and a potential cause for abuse and harm (see Ayten Dogan Keskin et al., ‘Sharenting Syndrome: An Appropriate Use of Social Media?’ May 2023, PMC Journal).
From another perspective, sharenting does not allow children to mature normally, as at some point they will have a persistent suspicion that they are being recorded. This forces them to live with different personas for public viewing, which may be the complete opposite of who they are and even what they truly like. At some point, perceived popularity, false personality, and false self-presentation affect one’s psychological and mental health, even among adults; how much more harmful will this be to children?
The appropriate government agencies and other interested stakeholders need to educate the public on the right to privacy for children and the potential harm of creating sharenting content. Also, children are not a capital for money-making at the cost of their happy and free childhood and their proper development as normal children.
It is also crucial that the public is informed and trained to report where they feel that a child’s private life, which is published online, is a danger to their safety and wellbeing. We should reach a point where we really see dangers for what they are and look with curiosity beyond the entertainment we see to end these new ways of exploiting children. Together we can keep children safe.
Shimbo Pastory is a Tanzanian advocate for positive social transformation. He is a student at the Ateneo de Manila University, Manila, Philippines. Website: www.shimbopastory.com.